News
TInubu call DSS to order
Daily Trust Editorial of Monday July 31, 2023
In his Democracy Day speech to Nigerians last month, then Speaker of the House of Representatives, Femi Gbajabiamila, now the top presidential aide, described President Bola Ahmed Tinubu as “a product of democracy” and “a thoroughbred democrat who is noted for his tenacious defence of democracy”.
We do not question the president’s claim to democratic credentials, but those credentials are now being put to test by the public behaviour of the Department of State Services (DSS), an agency that had its origins in Nigeria’s undemocratic past. How President Tinubu responds to the DSS’s increasingly erratic, and in several instances outrightly illegal behaviour towards Nigerian laws, sister agencies and citizens will go a long way in burnishing or tarnishing the President’s reputation as a democrat.
Unlike Tinubu, the DSS is not much known as a champion of democracy. Established near the twilight of military rule, the DSS was still an infant—scarcely a decade old—when Nigeria returned to democracy in 1999. By all reasonable expectations then, the agency should have matured along with democratic norms and practices. But few will credit the DSS with such a reputation. As late as last week, legal experts, civil society organizations and the media lambasted the DSS for yet more of its undemocratic practices, the litany of which, sadly, has by now become legion.
Not once but several times in the recent past, the DSS had laid siege on the National Assembly and barred members either from accessing their chambers, or from holding sessions. It has been on several occasions accused of interfering in election matters. Its men have clashed with those of other agencies, particularly the Police and the Armed Forces, sometimes at the real risk of agency-on-agency gun fights. The DSS has stormed or taken over buildings belonging to other government agencies, without legal warrants, in the name of conducting “investigations.”
And yet, as if in a bid to outdo its own undistinguished past, the DSS has literally run amok lately. We do not make this assertion lightly. First, we note, with concern that the DSS has conducted its activities more in the open and on the pages of newspapers than in the clandestine fashion required of an organization originally designed to be known only by its positive impact on internal security, but not to be seen or heard. This much was raised lately by many newspapers and civil society organizations in the country.
More worrisome still, the DSS has turned incompetent aggression into an operational method of sorts. In December, the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, no less, declined, for lack of sufficient evidence, an application by the DSS to arrest and detain then Governor of the Central Bank, Mr Godwin Emefiele, in order to pursue further investigations into allegations of “terrorism financing and economic crimes” against him.
Two weeks ago, three separate judges ruled that the DSS should release Mr Emefiele or charge him to court after having detained him since 10th June. The DSS then proceeded to court, but rather than with charges for terrorism financing or other economic crimes, the agency charged Emefiele for illegal possession of firearms and , leaving Nigerians asking, ‘what took you so long if this was all you had?
Still, when a judge granted Emefiele bail for that, the DSS promptly re-arrested him for yet to be disclosed charges, never mind the public show of shame between the DSS operatives and officials of the Nigeria Correctional Service who, by law, should have custody of accused persons processing bail terms and conditions.
We are deeply concerned by how the DSS has conducted itself in public through all these proceedings. First, all of these point to incompetence for an agency that should do its homework about allegations it makes against citizens before going public with them. Otherwise, security agencies are known to secretly share classified information with legislators and judges when pursuing sensitive cases that cannot be publicly disclosed. If this be the case with Emefiele, all the DSS needs to do is to share evidence of its allegations with respective judges and pursue the case more competently in classified fashion, rather than turn itself into a laughing stock before the whole nation.
We are equally concerned because Nigeria currently faces internal security challenges from disparate collection of non-state actors, from insurgents in the Northeast, to violent secessionists in the Southeast, to bandits and organized criminals almost everywhere else.
These are the challenges the DSS should be best equipped to help the Nigerian State deal with as a secret Police outfit. But to do that requires credibility and public confidence of Nigerians, both of which are now being frittered away.
We, therefore, call on President Tinubu to call the DSS to order. A democrat must oversee institutions that are seen to be democratic.
News
Court declares letter of Nafiu Bala’s resignation from ADC as fake
A Federal High Court in Abuja has ruled that a resignation letter allegedly signed by Nafiu Bala, a former deputy national chairman of the African Democratic Congress, ADC, was not genuine.
The court rejected the document, which the party had presented to argue that Bala voluntarily resigned from his position before the emergence of the leadership led by former Senate President David Mark.
In its judgment delivered on November 5, 2026, Justice Peter Lifu said the disputed letter could not be accepted as reliable evidence that Bala had relinquished his position.
The judge reached the decision after comparing the signature on the resignation letter with those on other documents submitted by Bala during the proceedings.
He found that the signatures were materially different and could not reasonably be considered to have been written by the same person.
“The fact that a document is certified, however, does not, by that fact alone, settle a genuine dispute as to whether the person named in it actually signed it,” the judge held.
The court also ruled that the ADC failed to prove that the appointment of Mark, former Osun State Governor Rauf Aregbesola and other party officials followed the democratic election process required by law.
Bala had approached the court to challenge the emergence of Mark as national chairman and Aregbesola as national secretary following the party’s 99th National Executive Committee, NEC, meeting held on July 29, 2025.
He argued that he was elected deputy national chairman on October 12, 2022, for a four-year tenure ending on October 11, 2026, and remained the only elected member of the party’s National Working Committee who had not resigned.
He also challenged the authenticity of a resignation letter dated May 17, 2025, insisting that the signature on the document was a forged and poor imitation of his genuine signature.
However, the ADC and other defendants maintained that Bala had voluntarily resigned and therefore lacked the legal right to challenge the party’s subsequent decisions.
They also argued that the party’s NEC had the authority to dissolve the existing National Working Committee and appoint new officers.
Rejecting their position, Justice Lifu said the defendants failed to provide sufficient evidence that party members or duly elected delegates participated in a democratic election to choose the new leadership.
The judge further explained that INEC’s decision to receive notice of the meeting and monitor its proceedings did not amount to proof that a valid election had taken place.
“The fact that INEC received notice of the meeting and monitored its proceedings does not fill this evidential gap. Notice to the Commission and democratic election are separate requirements, and proof of the former is not proof of the latter,” he said.
The court also held that the powers granted to the NEC under the ADC constitution could not override the constitutional and legal requirements for electing party executives.
It subsequently granted Bala’s substantive claims, nullified the relevant decisions taken at the July 29, 2025 meeting and restrained INEC from recognising Mark, Aregbesola and other members of the disputed National Working Committee as legitimate officers of the party.
News
Nigeria, Jamaica to sign Bilateral Air Service Agreement as Keyamo meets High Commissioner
Nigeria and Jamaica are set to strengthen bilateral aviation relations as both countries move closer to concluding and signing their reviewed Bilateral Air Services Agreement (BASA), following a meeting between the Honourable Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, Festus Keyamo, SAN, and the Jamaican High Commissioner to Nigeria, His Excellency Lincoln Downer.

The meeting focused on the finalisation of the existing BASA between the two countries, with particular emphasis on enhancing air travel, improving connectivity and creating a stronger framework for aviation cooperation between Nigeria and Jamaica.
The agreement, which has been in the pipeline, has undergone extensive legal and technical reviews by officials of both countries, with the respective teams working to perfect the necessary documentation ahead of its formal endorsement.
Speaking during the meeting, High Commissioner Downer expressed satisfaction with the progress made so far, noting that both countries had reached a critical stage in the process and were now looking towards setting a date for the signing.
He said: “So we’re pleased now that we’re at the point where we can now sign. We shared the legally reviewed text with your team, so I haven’t heard from them. That’s what I wanted to know today, where we stand, so that we can then set the date. You can give us an update?”
A statement by Tunde Moshood, Special Adviser on Media and Communication to the Hon. Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, quoted Keyamo to have requested the relevant file to ascertain the status of the documentation. He was briefed that the agreement had already undergone the necessary review by the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation and had been returned, with the process now at an advanced stage of completion.
The Minister subsequently directed that a final copy of the agreement be made available to the Jamaican High Commissioner for a final review and proofreading to ensure that both parties are fully satisfied with the text before proceeding to the signing.
Both sides are now working towards agreeing on a mutually convenient date for the formal endorsement, tentatively scheduled to take place in Kingston, Jamaica, either in the last week of November or the first week of December 2026.
The proposed signing represents another significant step in Nigeria’s efforts to deepen international aviation partnerships, expand air connectivity and strengthen bilateral cooperation through mutually beneficial air services agreements.
For Nigeria and Jamaica, the conclusion of the BASA is expected to provide an important framework for advancing aviation relations, facilitating easier air travel and exploring opportunities for stronger economic, tourism and people-to-people exchanges between the two countries.
The Minister reaffirmed the Federal Government’s commitment to ensuring the timely conclusion of the agreement, while directing relevant officials to expedite the final documentation process in readiness for the proposed signing in Jamaica.
News
ADC appeals judgment that sacked David Mark
The David Mark-led faction of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) has approached the Court of Appeal to challenge the Federal High Court judgement that removed its leadership.
The opposition party also disclosed that it had filed an application seeking a stay of execution of the judgement pending the hearing and determination of its appeal.
The party made this known in a statement on Friday, November 6, adding that it had formally notified the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) of the legal steps taken,
The appeal is against the judgement delivered by the Federal High Court in Abuja on November 5, 2026, in Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/1619/2025, involving Hon. Nafiu Bala Gombe and the ADC.
The party urged INEC to refrain from taking any further action on the matter until the Court of Appeal has considered the case.
It argued that the application for a stay of execution was yet to be decided and that the electoral commission should not take any step that could affect the outcome of the appeal.
According to the ADC, it expects INEC to respect the ongoing legal process and allow the appellate court to hear the matter before making any decision connected to the judgement.
The statement partly read, “The ADC is exercising its lawful right to appeal. The judgement is now being challenged before a higher court, and the legal process must be allowed to run its course.
“We expect INEC to uphold the law and take full account of the pending proceedings before making any consequential decisions.”
The party also urged its members and supporters to remain calm, insisting that the court judgement would not stop its political activities.
It said its campaigns would continue while it explored all available legal options to defend its position.
-
News2 years agoSenate to speed up conclusion of Nigeria Forest Security Service Bill
-
News1 year agoThe Many Lies Against Bashir Haske
-
News3 years ago“Anytime we want to kill terrorists, President would ask us to take permission from France but they were killing our soldiers-” Niger Republic coup leader
-
News3 years agoBreaking: Tinubu’s authentic ministerial nominees
-
News5 months agoSee your state governor’s performance ranking
-
News3 years ago“I’m leaving the Catholic church because Bishop Onah is oppressing me,” says Okunerere
-
News3 years agoMy nude photo leak was a mistake- lawyer Ifunanya
-
News3 years agoRadio Nigeria’s veteran broadcaster Kelvin Ugwu dies three months after retirement from service
