Business
TTB/Union bank ownership: A call for transparent investigation

By Azubike Ugwu
In the last three days, we have seen a storm of allegations regarding the ownership of Titan Trust Bank Limited (TTB) and Union Bank of Nigeria Plc (“Union Bank”), and this has captured public attention. These claims, reportedly stemming from a report submitted to the President by a Special Investigator, Mr Jim Obaze, have initiated a critical discussion around transparency. However, the lack of access to the report begs for an open dialogue to clarify the unfolding narrative.
The core accusation revolves around the former Central Bank Governor’s alleged use of intermediaries in acquiring Union Bank and doubts about whether Titan Bank met the reported purchase price. To understand the gravity of these claims, it’s imperative to grasp the financial magnitude of the investors steering these banks.
TGI Group, with assets exceeding ₦3.75 trillion and 2022 revenues surpassing ₦1.74 trillion, emerges as a financial powerhouse. To underscore this, the sale of its subsidiary “Chivita” to Coca-Cola Group companies in 2020 for more than USD 500 million, a figure nearly three times the alleged equity element in the Union Bank acquisition, speaks volumes about the group’s financial robustness. TGI Group’s financial resilience, underscored by concrete figures, paints a picture of stability.
Contrary to these allegations, documents availed necessary parties indicate that payment for Union Bank shares was indeed made, raising questions about the accuracy of claims suggesting non-payment and highlighting the importance of verifying such financial transactions. Titan Trust Bank’s chairman, Mr Tunde Lemo, has strongly refuted the allegations made by the special investigator, providing details and names that can confirm the transparency and integrity of the transaction. Drawing parallels, it’s akin to questioning a transaction’s legitimacy while the receipts stand as concrete evidence.
The news of Mr. Lemo being summoned by the special investigator once again has been making waves in the business community. The investigator has written a letter in reaction to the rebuttal made by Titan Trust Bank. The letter stated that Mr Lemo and TTB’s rebuttal was offensive.
The letter is filled with many allegations, and it has raised questions about the independence and bias of the investigation. Many wonder whether Mr Obaze is singling out Mr Lemo for unknown offences or if the investigation is truly unbiased and objective.
It is important to note that Mr. Lemo is a respected figure in the business community, and many have lauded his efforts. He has always been known for his dedication and hard work. Therefore, the allegations made against him have come as a surprise to many.
The scrutiny extends to Luxis and Magna, the UAE-based holding companies accused of lacking a physical presence in Dubai. Yet, in the global business landscape, such corporate structures are commonplace. TGI’s financial fortitude backing these entities accentuates their credibility, emphasising the need for context in evaluating business practices. TGI, in its statement, categorically affirmed that “the entire transaction was managed by highly reputed global financial institutions including Rothschild and Citibank. And like most major acquisitions, the process took years to complete. A USD 300 million loan was sourced from the African Export-Import Bank (Afrexim), and the rest of the capital was sourced from the proceeds of TGI’s sales of its Chi Ltd business to Coca-Cola, all to finance the acquisition of Union Bank.”
Another layer to the controversy involves a “mysterious shareholder” supposedly providing interest-free long-term loans. Examination of the financial records reveals that these loans were granted within the TGI Group, illustrating a standard business practice. Parallels can be drawn to global corporate scenarios, where loans within a closely-knit business ecosystem are considered normal.
The allegations surrounding Mr. Cornelius Vink, the founder of TGI Group, necessitate a balanced perspective. As a distinguished Dutch national, his cooperation in providing requested documents to the investigator showcases a commitment to transparency. Analogously, it mirrors other reputable figures in international business who willingly subject themselves to scrutiny.
Turning our attention to the alleged recommendation for the government to take over Union Bank, the financial stability of Union Bank and Titan Bank, coupled with the investigator’s apparent lack of statutory powers for such recommendations, raises questions about the credibility of this assertion. It’s akin to questioning the legitimacy of a referee’s call beyond the established rules of the game. Mr Obaze lacks the necessary statutory powers to make such calls and appears once again to be arrogating powers to himself that are not legal. Perhaps we should remember and question his many ‘allegations’ against corporate entities and individuals that were just him bloviating.
Amidst this uncertainty, the call for transparency echoes louder. TGI Group’s financial resilience, fortified by concrete evidence, underscores the importance of a candid dialogue to address the swirling allegations surrounding the Union Bank/Titan Trust Bank transaction. The figures presented and the parallels drawn serve as signposts guiding the need for clarity in this complex financial tapestry.
The business community eagerly awaits the outcome of this investigation and hopes the truth will come out. Until then, these questions must be answered.
1. Why did the Special Investigator go to the media instead of taking the usual investigative or legal route?
2. Is this an attempt to create negative publicity for the Banks, TGI and personalities involved without presenting any evidence?
3. If the Special Investigator believes that Mr Godwin Emefiele owns the bank as he has alleged, why hasn’t he provided any evidence after such a lengthy investigation?
4. Why is he specifically targeting and harassing legitimate business owners and professionals?
5. Is the Special Investigator suggesting that the government is willing to face significant consequences by seizing private investments, especially when the nation is actively trying to attract foreign investments?
It is prudent for Mr Obaze to remember that rather than this media trial that he has embarked on, “affirmanti non neganti incumbit probation” – the burden of proof lies on him, who asserts.
Business
Dangote replies PETROAN on price reduction, says refinery built by Nigerian for welfare of Nigerians

The management of Dangote Refinery Limited has said the company’s primary concern is how to supply its products to Nigerians and at prices they can afford; rather than maximise profit at the detriment of the citizens.
Anthony Chiejina, Group Chief Corporate Communications Officer, Dangote Industries Limited stated this on Tuesday, while speaking exclusively to Nationwide Reports.
Chiejina was reacting to a statement credited to the Petroleum Products Retail Outlet Owners Association (PRETOAN), which on Monday, lamented that reduction of price of Premium Motor Spirit (PMS), by Dangote Refinery and the NNPCL was affecting their businesses as they rely on importation.
Chiejina said with Dangote Refinery, Nigerians are now guaranteed best quality products they have ever used and can therefore bid goodbye to importation of substandard products into the country.
He told Nationwide Reports that PETROAN had no reason to complain against price deduction by Dangote, as according to him, Dangote Refinery was built by a Nigerian for Nigerians, promising that it would continue to put the interest of Nigerians first in its business considerations.
Chiejina said with Dangote Refinery, thousands of jobs have been created for the people, in addition huge taxes that the company is paying to the Federal Government, adding that the overall aim was to achieve self-sufficiency in the petroleum sector as additional contribution to the nation’s economic growth.
He challenged petrol importers to tell Nigerians how they have helped the country in the areas of foreign exchange conservation and employment as well as how much axes they are paying to the government.
Chiejina expressed surprise that some persons are still talking of fuel importation at a time when all hands should be on deck to make Nigeria self-sufficient, adding that by complaining against Dangote, the marketers have shown that they are not aware of the impending impact of ongoing economic revolution across the world, where countries without capacity to produce their energy requirements may face serious challenges.
Business
Why petrol marketers are angry with Dangote, NNPCL

Marketers of Petroleum Motor Spirit (PMS) also known as petrol in Nigeria are not happy with Dangote refinery and the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited, NNPCL, over their decision to reduce price of the essential product, aimed at ameliorating economic challenges facing the people.
It would be recalled that Dangote refinery has reduced price of petrol three times, first before Christmas and New Year celebrations and two times since January.
But the Petroleum Products Retail Outlet Owners Association has said that petrol marketers lost billions due to the downward review of fuel prices by Dangote Refinery and the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited, NNPCL.
The association’s spokesman Joseph Obele disclosed this on Monday, saying there was a need for healthy competition and price stability within Nigeria’s petroleum downstream sector.
Last week Monday, NNPCL dropped its retail petrol price to N860 and N880 per litre from N945 and N965 in Lagos and Abuja, respectively.
NNPC’s petrol price drop followed Dangote Refinery’s retail fuel price reduction to N860 and N880 per litre across its retail partners.
The development sparked a fresh price war between NNPCL and Dangote Refinery.
Reacting to fluctuations and price instability, PETROAN recommended a six-month price stability mechanism.
“PETROAN is firmly committed to the Petroleum Industry Stakeholders Forum and stands firm in advocating for healthy competition, full liberalisation, and price stability in the downstream sector. We urgently urge NMDPRA to quickly swing into action to ensure fair pricing. We believe that by working together, industry stakeholders, government, and consumers can create a vibrant, competitive market that benefits everyone.
“For the average citizen, sudden spikes in fuel prices can lead to financial strain and uncertainty.”
The association stressed that the sudden downward review of prices has resulted in massive losses, with those affected counting their losses in billions of naira.
“This situation poses a significant fear for further investment in the sector, as investors are wary of unpredictable market conditions. Moreover, the threat of price fluctuations is affecting the business boom in the sector, which will definitely lead to retrenchment. This will have far-reaching consequences, including job losses and economic instability.
“To address these challenges, PETROAN proposed that regulatory authorities establish mechanisms to encourage price stability for at least six months. This approach will help reduce the uncertainty and risk associated with investments in the sector, ultimately promoting economic development and protecting the interests of consumers and Nigerians.”
According to PETROAN, they advocated for a multiplicity of supply sources, including Dangote Refinery, NNPC refineries, modular refineries, and imports, to foster competition in the downstream sector.
“After due consultation with key stakeholders and players in the petroleum sector, the Petroleum Products Retail Outlets Owners Association of Nigeria (PETROAN) has taken a firm stance on promoting healthy competition and controlling price fluctuations in the downstream sector.
“To this effect, PETROAN advocates the importance of preventing monopolies and ensuring local refineries thrive, given their significant economic benefits to the country.
“The importance of healthy competition: Healthy competition is essential for fostering innovation, improving service delivery, and ensuring that consumers have access to affordable products. When competition thrives, it leads to better choices for consumers and ultimately contributes to economic growth.
“PETROAN firmly believes that a competitive downstream sector is not just beneficial but necessary.
“To achieve this, PETROAN advocates for a multiplicity of supply sources, including Dangote Refinery, NNPC refineries, modular refineries, and imports. This diverse range of sources will foster competition, especially with imports, allowing for comparisons with international market prices and protecting the local market from exploitation.
“We advocate for policies that dismantle barriers to entry for new players, promote fair practices among existing companies, and ensure that no single entity can dominate the market to the detriment of consumers,” the statement reads.
Business
Latest update: 20 richest people on earth, March 2025

By Elijah Ntongai with Agency reports
Elon Musk, American tech billionaire, sill leads globally as the richest person on earth, followed by Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos.
Others are French luxury mogul Bernard Arnault who ranks fourth and Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison follows at number five while Bill Gates, Larry Page, Warren Buffett and Sergey Brin are sill forces to reckon with.
According to Bloomberg Billionaires Index, the first two months of 2025 have been a turbulent period for the world’s richest as there has been significant volatility in the net worth of the richest individuals in the world which has been driven by the ups and downs witnessed in the global tech industry, for example the recent market dip caused market grow of Chinese-owned Deep Seek.
Here is the list the richest individuals in the word
1. Elon Musk – $330B (US) (KSh 42.41 trillion)
Elon Musk leads with a $330 billion net worth (about KSh 42.41 trillion) from a wealth portfolio of stocks in Tesla, SpaceX and X Corp alongside stakes in xAI, Neuralink, and The Boring Company.
2. Mark Zuckerberg – $221B (US) (KSh 28.39 trillion)
Mark Zuckerberg, with $221 billion (KSh 28.39 trillion), trails Musk by $109 billion. His wealth stems from Meta, the social media giant behind Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, which has recently reported significant growth driven by AI innovations.
3. Jeff Bezos – $220B (US) (KSh 28.26 trillion)
Jeff Bezos holds $220 billion (KSh 28.26 trillion), anchored by Amazon, the e-commerce and cloud computing behemoth, as well as his stakes in Blue Origin and The Washington Post.
4. Bernard Arnault – $148B (KSh 18.998 trillion) (France)
Bernard Arnault’s $148 billion fortune, down $9.2 billion, is tied to LVMH, the luxury goods conglomerate behind Louis Vuitton, Dior, and Hennessy. His consumer-focused empire thrives on global demand for high-end products.
5. Larry Ellison – $176B (KSh 22.616 trillion) (US)
Larry Ellison’s $176 billion is backed by his role as Oracle’s co-founder and CTO, a database and cloud computing firm.
6. Bill Gates – $164B (KSh 21.074 trillion) (US)
Bill Gates has built his $164 billion fortune through Microsoft. Now he is a philanthropist, and his wealth is managed through Cascade Investment, which has stakes in diverse sectors across the globe.
7. Larry Page – $157B (KSh 20.148 trillion) (US)
Larry Page is a Google co-founder, and his $157 billion net worth is anchored on his stake in Alphabet Inc., the parent company behind Google and other investments in AI, cloud computing, and self-driving tech via Waymo.
8. Warren Buffett – $155B (KSh 19.918 trillion) (US)
Warren Buffett’s $155 billion is rooted in Berkshire Hathaway, a conglomerate with holdings in insurance, energy, and consumer goods, showcasing his value-investing prowess.
9. Sergey Brin – $147B (KSh 18.889 trillion) (US)
Sergey Brin, with $147 billion, co-founded Google with Larry Page, and his net worth is also based on his Alphabet stake.
10. Steve Ballmer – $136B (KSh 17.496 trillion) (US)
Steve Ballmer’s $136 billion stems from his Microsoft tenure as CEO and a significant stake, plus ownership of the Los Angeles Clippers and other investments.
11. Jim Walton – $114B (KSh 14.634 trillion) (US)
Jim Walton’s $114 billion comes from Walmart, the retail giant founded by his father, Sam Walton, where he holds a substantial family stake.
12. Rob Walton – $111B (KSh 14.264 trillion) (US)
Rob Walton, with $111 billion, also inherited the Walmart wealth.
13. Alice Walton – $111B (KSh 14.264 trillion) (US)
Alice Walton matches her brother Rob at $111 billion, with her fortune tied to Walmart and her art philanthropy via the Crystal Bridges Museum.
14. Amancio Ortega – $108B (KSh 13.894 trillion) (US)
Amancio Ortega’s $108 billion is driven by Inditex, the parent company behind Zara, which has recorded significant growth in the global fashion market.
15. Michael Dell – $106B (KSh 13.664 trillion) (US)
Michael Dell’s $106 billion is rooted in his role as CEO of Dell Technologies and past investments in tech and the banking industry.
16. Jensen Huang – $99.9B (KSh 12.829 trillion) (US)
Jensen Huang’s $99.9 billion comes from NVIDIA, the AI and graphics chip maker riding on the AI boom.
17. Mukesh Ambani – $88.1B (KSh 11.322 trillion) (India)
Mukesh Ambani’s $88.1 billion net worth is fueled by Reliance Industries, spanning energy, petrochemicals, and telecom via Jio.
18. Carlos Slim – $82.8B (KSh 10.636 trillion) (Mexico)
Carlos Slim’s $82.8 billion net worth is built on América Móvil, a telecom giant, and other diverse investments.
19. Francoise Bettencourt Meyers – $81.5B (KSh 10.481 trillion) (France)
Francoise Bettencourt Meyers, with $81.5 billion, inherited L’Oréal, the cosmetics empire,from her family.
20. Julia Flesher Koch & Family – $74.4B (KSh 9.559 trillion) (US)
-
News2 years ago
Breaking: Tinubu’s authentic ministerial nominees
-
News2 years ago
“Anytime we want to kill terrorists, President would ask us to take permission from France but they were killing our soldiers-” Niger Republic coup leader
-
News2 years ago
“I’m leaving the Catholic church because Bishop Onah is oppressing me,” says Okunerere
-
News2 months ago
Senate to speed up conclusion of Nigeria Forest Security Service Bill
-
News2 years ago
Dokpesi and the Gazebo Mystique
-
News2 years ago
Radio Nigeria’s veteran broadcaster Kelvin Ugwu dies three months after retirement from service
-
News1 year ago
Persons against Allagoa’s reforms behind protests at NSITF
-
News2 years ago
Tsunami: Tinubu orders dissolution of managements, boards of MDAs, to sack all Buhari’s political appointees