Connect with us

News

Man seeking Jonathan’s disqualification from presidential contest absent in court

Published

on

Please Kindly Share This Story

By Bonaventure Phillips Melah

Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal high court in Abuja on Monday, adjourned till Friday, hearing on the suit seeking to stop former president, Dr. Goodluck Jonathan from contesting the 2027 presidential election.

It would be recalled that though Jonathan has not declared intention to contest the election, many groups from across Nigeria have been calling on him to contest the election in order to rescue the nation from mirage of challenges including hunger, high cost of living, bad economy, high cost of petroleum products and others.

The suit, instituted by a lawyer, Johnmary Jideobi, could not proceed as no counsel appeared for the plaintiff, Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF).

When the case was called, only Jonathan’s lawyer, Chief Chris Uche, SAN, was in coury.

Uche informed the court that the matter was fixed for hearing and the court was magnanimous to the parties to fix the proceeding at 2pm.

The senior lawyer, therefore, applied that the matter be struck out for lack of diligent prosecution.

He submitted that the plaintiff’s lawyer, Ndubuisi Ukpai, who was in court on the last adjourned, had not deemed it fit to either be present or sent a letter why he would not be in court.

Besides, Uche said the plaintiff, Jideobi, who is also a lawyer, was not in court and no excuse was offered as to why they would not be present.

“My Lord, what it means is that they have lost interest in pursuing the suit, particularly after we have filed and served our notice of preliminary objection and other processes.

“And in a matter where processes have been exchanged, we may ask that the matter be dismissed,” he said.

According to him, the rules of this court empower your lordship to strike out the suit for want of diligent prosecution.

“So, we humbly apply that it be struck out or dismissed with a very substantial cost,” he prayed.

Justice Lifu then asked the registrar to confirm from the court file if hearing notices were served on INEC and AGF, the 2nd and 3rd defendants in the case.

And it was confirmed that neither INEC nor AGF was served.

The judge therefore held that in the interest of fair hearing, the 2nd and 3rd defendants should be afforded another opportunity.

But Uche, who argued that INEC and AGF were passive in the matter, said if struck out, the order would be beneficial to the 2nd and 3rd defendants because it would have no adverse effect on them.

He said this was necessary given the nature of the matter and the status of the person he brought to court.

He, therefore, sought a N5 million cost against the plaintiff.

“For every default, there must be a consequence.

“So we urge your lordship to exercise the right you have under the rules of the court in our favour,” he said.

The judge, however, restated the need to give the other parties another opportunity.

“Let us give them time. Let this order be served on INEC because INEC is fundamental in this case

“Let us listen to INEC in this matter,” he said.

Justice Lifu consequently adjourned the matter until May 15 for a definite hearing.

“In the circumstances of this case, I am minded to bend backward to accommodate the plaintiff and the 2nd and 3rd defendants who have consistently absent,” he said.

The judge observed that the hearing was fixed at 2pm in agreement with the plaintiff’s lawyer.

The judge then ordered that hearing notices be issued and served on the plaintiff, INEC and AGF for the last time.

Dr. Jonathan, in his preliminary objection filed by his lawyer, said Jideobi lacked the legal right to file the suit.

According to him, the suit is purely speculative, founded on conjecture, premature and predicated on media speculation, as there was no nomination, no election and no cause of action.

“The court lacks jurisdiction to entertain hypothetical constitutional questions.

“The suit constitutes a gross abuse of court process, aimed at obtaining a pre-emptive political judgment.

“Cosmetic joinder of 2nd and 3rd defendants is a mere jurisdictional artifice,” the ex-president said.

Jonathan submitted that the issues raised had already been judicially settled by a subsisting judgment of the Federal High Court, Yenagoa.

The former president, therefore, sought an order striking out the suit for want of jurisdiction and as constituting a gross abuse of court process.

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Police condemn killing of Benue MACBAN chairman

Published

on

Please Kindly Share This Story

Benue State Police Command has condemned the killing of the Chairman of the Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association of Nigeria (MACBAN), Benue State chapter, Ardo Rabo Mohammed, and another man, Yakubu Isa, describing the attack as a senseless criminal act capable of undermining ongoing peace and security efforts in the state.

The victims were reportedly attacked by gunmen while returning from a security meeting along the Okwudu-Ogoli Road in Otukpo Local Government Area.

In a statement issued on Saturday, the Police Public Relations Officer, DSP Udeme Edet, said the Commissioner of Police, CP Cletus C.N. Nwadiogbu, condemned the killings and expressed condolences to the families of the deceased.

“The Commissioner of Police strongly condemns in its entirety the brutal killing of the Chairman of Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association of Nigeria (MACBAN), Benue State chapter, Ardo Rabo Mohammed, and one Yakubu Isa, who were reportedly attacked by unknown assailants while returning from a security meeting along Okwudu-Ogoli Road, Otukpo,” the statement read.

According to the police, the command has commenced a full-scale investigation into the incident, with tactical and intelligence teams deployed to track down those responsible.

The Commissioner assured residents that the command would leave no stone unturned in ensuring the perpetrators are identified, arrested and prosecuted.

He appealed to members of the public to remain calm, avoid taking the law into their own hands, and refrain from spreading unverified information capable of escalating tensions.

The police also urged anyone with credible information that could aid the investigation to report to the nearest police station or contact the command through its emergency lines.

Continue Reading

News

Lady identifies bandits that abducted her, leading to their arrested wth N11m recovered

Published

on

Please Kindly Share This Story

Three bandits have been arrested in Benue state after a lady who they had kidnapped and released, identified them at a motor park and raised alarm.

The k!kidnappers came to Ihotu park to board a vehicle to Makurdi and were met by the lady they had earlier kidnapped and released after collecting ransom from her relatives.

They were even using a bag they collected from the girl. The girl raised the alarm, held one inside the vehicle, and two took to their heels, but were caught.

They had a ghana-must-go bag at the back of the vehicle. N11m was found inside the bag.

Following the confirmation of their identity by another lady who was also their victim, mob gathered around with the intent to beat them up and possibly set them ablaze.

But the park manager decided to invite the police and soldiers who rescued them and took them to their station.

It was later gathered that the Benue state Governor, Rev. Father Hyacinth Alia called and said he was interested in the case which made the police to take the apprehended bandits to Makurdi, the state capital.

 

 

Continue Reading

News

Tinubu’s govt ignores IMF, draws additional loan of $2.5b from UAE

Published

on

Please Kindly Share This Story

President Bola Tinubu Federal Government has drawn down $1.5bn from a $5bn financing facility arranged with the United Arab Emirates’ largest lender, First Abu Dhabi Bank, despite growing concerns from global financial institutions over the increasing use of complex derivative financing by African sovereigns.

Bloomberg reported on Friday that the latest drawdown represents the first tranche of a $5bn Total Return Swap facility approved by the National Assembly on March 31, 2026, and is expected to support the 2026 budget, finance infrastructure projects, and refinance existing debt obligations.

The report quoted people familiar with the transaction, who asked not to be identified because they were not authorised to speak to the media.

The report read, “Nigeria has accessed the first tranche of a $5bn derivatives deal with the United Arab Emirates’ largest lender, pressing ahead with a transaction that has been scrutinised for being opaque.

“The West African nation drew about $1.5bn in the last couple of weeks from a total return swap transaction with First Abu Dhabi Bank PJSC, according to people familiar with the transaction, who asked not to be identified because they were not authorised to speak to the media.”

The transaction comes at a time when Nigeria is facing higher borrowing costs in international capital markets, forcing the government to seek alternative financing arrangements to shore up its fiscal position and improve access to foreign exchange liquidity.

Under the arrangement, Nigeria is required to pledge Federal Government securities worth about 133 per cent of any amount drawn under the facility. This means that for the full $5bn facility, the government would have to post approximately $6.65bn worth of naira-denominated bonds as collateral.

In return, the Abu Dhabi-based lender provides dollar liquidity to the Nigerian government. The Federal Government will pay a floating interest rate benchmark plus about four percentage points, while the lender receives the returns generated by the underlying government securities.

The transaction effectively allows Nigeria to unlock immediate dollar funding without issuing new Eurobonds or taking on traditional external loans at prevailing market rates, which have become increasingly expensive for frontier economies.

The government has already indicated that the proceeds from the initial $1.5bn drawdown will be deployed to support budget implementation, fund critical infrastructure projects, and refinance costlier domestic and external debts.

However, the financing arrangement has attracted criticism from international financial institutions and market analysts over concerns about transparency and potential hidden liabilities.

In its June 2026 assessment of African sovereign debt markets, the International Monetary Fund warned that derivative financing structures such as total return swaps are often opaque and difficult for investors and creditors to monitor.

The IMF noted that such arrangements are “hard to track, hard to value in real time, and can obscure the true extent of a country’s financial obligations.”

Three days ago, Fitch Ratings warned that Nigeria’s planned $5bn financing arrangement with First Abu Dhabi Bank could increase sovereign debt risks and reduce transparency in public debt reporting.

 

 

 

Continue Reading

Trending