News
PDP: Ghost of Ibadan Convention Vs Legal Reasoning
By Umar Sani
The article titled “The Ghosts of Ibadan and the Finality of Supreme Court Judgments,” written by Dahiru Yusuf Yabo, suffers from a fundamental contradiction. While the author repeatedly invokes the doctrine of finality of Supreme Court judgments, he seems unwilling to accept the actual implications of the judgments given by both the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal regarding the leadership dispute within the People’s Democratic Party (PDP).
The main question isn’t whether Supreme Court judgments are final; they are. The real question is: What exactly did the Supreme Court decide, and what legal consequences followed from that decision? The author skips this crucial question.
In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court dismissed the cross-appeal upon which the Wike-backed faction had based much of its claim to legitimacy. More importantly, after the Court nullified the Ibadan Convention, it affirmed that the actions of the suspended officers, whose authority underpinned that faction’s claim to leadership, were abrogated. The legal consequence is simple. Once the foundation collapses, everything built on it falls with it.
The Court of Appeal reaffirmed this principle in the subsequent proceedings related to the Ibadan Convention dispute. The appellate court questioned the basis on which certain individuals claimed re-election and specifically challenged the failure to establish where, when, and how this purported re-election took place.
Even more significantly, the Court of Appeal argued that the various structures that emerged after the Ibadan Convention could not survive the invalidation of the convention itself. These structures existed only because of the convention. Once the convention was legally nullified, everything stemming from it became legally unsustainable. This is basic law. You cannot declare the root dead and then insist the branches remain alive.
Curiously, the author urges respect for judicial finality while advocating recognition of structures whose legal foundation has already been removed by the courts. This stance is not a defense of judicial authority; it’s a selective view of judicial authority.
The article also criticizes the decision of the PDP Board of Trustees and the National Executive Committee to seek legal clarification and enforcement against INEC. Yet this criticism reveals a misunderstanding of the legal process.
When a constitutional body like INEC refuses, delays, or fails to act on judicial rulings, the lawful remedy is not street protests, media campaigns, or self-help. The proper action is to return to court for interpretation, clarification, and enforcement orders that compel compliance. That is exactly what the PDP’s lawful organs have done.
Indeed, if the author truly believes in the supremacy of law, he should applaud rather than condemn the recourse to courts.
The claim that seeking judicial interpretation is a way of relitigating settled issues is also misplaced. Courts regularly interpret their own judgments when disputes about meaning, scope, or enforcement arise. These procedures do not reopen the case; they ensure compliance.
Another false concern is the focus on the names displayed on INEC’s portal. INEC isn’t constitutionally empowered to decide who leads political parties. Many judicial authorities have confirmed that leadership disputes should be resolved according to party constitutions and court decisions. Recognition by INEC doesn’t create legitimacy. Legitimacy comes from the law.
The electoral commission can’t give validity to arrangements without a legal basis, nor can a temporary administrative listing on a portal override court rulings.
The author also treats the PDP’s problems as if they are unique. They are not. Many opposition parties have faced interference, inconsistent regulation, and political pressure recently. The PDP isn’t facing a new or unusual situation but is part of a broader pattern in Nigeria’s politics.
Perhaps the most ironic part of the article is its repeated use of the ghost metaphor. If any ghosts are involved here, they are not the PDP’s lawful organs seeking legal enforcement. The real ghosts are the remnants of structures whose legal foundation has already been dismantled by courts but which still appear to seek legitimacy.
The Supreme Court has spoken. The Court of Appeal has spoken. The legal effects of these decisions are clear. The challenge for the PDP isn’t whether they should obey the courts but how to fully implement court judgments.
That is exactly what the Board of Trustees, the National Executive Committee, and other lawful organs of the party are attempting.
Those who genuinely respect judicial finality should support, not oppose, that effort.
For those whose political ambitions depend on positions and structures no longer backed by law, the harsh reality remains: no amount of rhetoric can revive what the courts have already laid to rest.
News
NHRC calls for suspension, prosecution of senator Fadahunsi over threat to kill Accord Party supporters
The National Human Rights Commission, NHRC, has urged the senate, to suspend the senator representing Osun West, Francis Adenigba Fadahunsi for threatening to kill Accord Party members and supporters if they come out to vote on Saturday.
The senator, while addressing party supporters at Ilesha on Saturday, threatened Accord Party members and urged his party loyalists to kill them if they come out to vote in the coming governorship election August 15.
“From now on, whenever you see Accord members, kill them. I authorise you to kill them. They have wives and children too. This is a Federal Government election. On election day, even if they come with voter cards, we won’t allow them to vote,” the PDP senator said.
Reacting to the development, the Executive Secretary of the Commission, Tony Ojukwu, SAN, said the statement was capable to setting the nation ablaze and lead to abuse of rights of citizens as well as loss of lives.
He described this remarks as incitement to murder, electoral violence, and voter intimidation, saying no well meaning Nigeria should sit by and allow such rhetoric to be tolerated without consequences from the law enforcement authorities.
Ojukwu said it was not enough for the Senator to attempt explaining what he meant by the threat after the massive rebuke from the public, adding that many of his followers have already taken his directives to heart.
In a statement Wednesday, Ojukwu also urged all party chairmen to issue directives to their members to desist from any hateful , inciting, intimidating and call to violence statements ahead of all coming up elections.
“Any candidates or party faithfuls who violate these directives should be called out for violating constitutional and electoral frameworks for peaceful elections and should be surrendered to law enforcement authorities for prosecution,” Ojukwu said.
“This is not politics. This is a licence to kill. A public officer who tells citizens to murder other citizens because of party affiliation must not be allowed to remain in office for one more day,” Ojukwu said.
“The Senate leadership is hereby called upon to suspend Senator Fadahunsi immediately pending conclusive investigation by the police.
The Police and DSS must also arrest, investigate, and prosecute him now. We cannot wait until blood is spilled in Osun before we act. Prevention is the duty of the state and the leadership of the NASS is part of the state.”
The alleged remarks come days before the August 15 Osun governorship election
The NHRC said that given the gravity of the statements attributed to the Senator in the video, the matter requires urgent investigation by security agencies under due process.
The Commission is calling on authorities to immediately suspend Senator Fadahunsi from all Senate duties pending investigation.
The Commission urged citizens of Osun to remain peaceful and to report any threats to the Commission and relevant authorities as it has set up a situation room to report and document such incidents during the election period.
News
I have no regrets for my statement, I won’t apologize- says Sheikh Yahya Jingir
Sheikh Yahya jingir, an Islamic cleric and leader of the Izala Scholars Council, has said he has no regret over his recent declaration of support for a Muslim-Muslim presidential ticket, despite criticisms trailing the statement.
Jingir, who spoke in an interview with BBC Hausa monitored by Nationwide Reports on Wednesday, said his position was not politically motivated or intended to campaign for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, but was based on what he described as his responsibility as a Muslim.
He said he would continue to support and encourage Muslims to back a Muslim-Muslim ticket, regardless of the criticisms his position might attract.
“I will continue to support and encourage the Muslim-Muslim ticket. What they say would not stop me. They started it; at a point, we suffered in their hands,” he alleged.
The cleric had, during a mass wedding organised by the Kano State Government for 1,500 couples, declared his support for the Muslim-Muslim arrangement and urged Muslims to vote in a manner that would demonstrate their numerical strength in the country.
Jingir said he decided to support the arrangement after President Tinubu “raised the flag” of the Muslim-Muslim ticket.
He added that, as a Muslim preacher, he had the right to advocate a political arrangement that was consistent with his religious convictions.
The cleric also challenged claims that Christians or other religious groups constituted a larger population than Muslims in Nigeria.
His remarks have continued to generate reactions, with some commentators describing them as divisive, while others have defended his right to express his religious and political views.
News
Nigerian senator Francis Adenigba Fadahunsi urges loyalists to kill Accord party members, supporters on Osun election day
Francis Adenigba Fadahunsi, the senator representing Osun East Senatorial District, has threatened to kill Accord Party members and supporters if they are seen on election day.
The Osun state governorship election is taking place on Saturday August 15.
Fadahunsi, who spoke in Yoruba while addressing supporters in Ilesha, said there would be trouble if members of the Accord Party were seen in the area, urging his supporters to come out and vote during the election.He also called on those present to record his statement, while making a remark that suggested his supporters would confront Accord Party members if they encountered them before the election.
“If we hear of Accord Party members coming to Ilesha, there will be trouble. We will all come out and vote. Please record me. We are here, and between now and the election, if we see anyone from the Accord Party, we will kill them,” he said.
The statement comes amid heightened political activities in Osun State ahead of the governorship election, with political parties intensifying campaigns and mobilisation of supporters across the state.
Fadahunsi is a member of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and currently represents Osun East Senatorial District in the National Assembly.
-
News1 year agoSenate to speed up conclusion of Nigeria Forest Security Service Bill
-
News1 year agoThe Many Lies Against Bashir Haske
-
News3 years agoBreaking: Tinubu’s authentic ministerial nominees
-
News3 years ago“Anytime we want to kill terrorists, President would ask us to take permission from France but they were killing our soldiers-” Niger Republic coup leader
-
News3 years ago“I’m leaving the Catholic church because Bishop Onah is oppressing me,” says Okunerere
-
News3 years agoRadio Nigeria’s veteran broadcaster Kelvin Ugwu dies three months after retirement from service
-
News3 years agoMy nude photo leak was a mistake- lawyer Ifunanya
-
News3 years agoDokpesi and the Gazebo Mystique
