Connect with us

News

“Why Mmesoma must be prosecuted,” JAMB insists

Published

on

Please Kindly Share This Story

The Joint Admission and Matriculations Board (JAMB), has insisted that Miss Mmesoma Ejikeme who forged her 2023 UTME result and gave herself 362 marks instead of the 246 she scored, will be prosecuted because she consciously planned and executed the criminal act which was capable of destroying the integrity of the Board as well as plunge the nation into sectional crisis.

Dr. Fabian Benjamin, Head of Protocol and Public Relations of JAMB, reiterated this in an interview with Nationwide Reports on Saturday.

The JAMB’s spokesman also took a swipe at the former Minister for Education, Dr. Obiageli Ezekwesili for doubting the Board’s findings on the matter but rather demanding for forensic investigation.

Nationwide Reports wanted to know what next JAMB plans to do, in view of the confessions of Mmesoma as contained in the report by the panel set up by Anambra state government.

The report submitted to Governor Chukwuma Soludo on Friday as made public by the state commissioner for Information, indicted Mmesona for manipulation and forging her result, commended JAMB for professionally handling the matter and recommended that the student immediately apologise to JAMB for her actions.

But reacting, Dr. Benjamin told Nationwide Reports that the Board was not expecting anything different from the outcome of the Anambra State Government’s probe because it had no reason to doubt its foolproof facilities and apps which he said have proved to be top notch.

Describing Mmesoma as a ‘first class criminal,’ the JAMB spokesman said she deserves the highest level of condemnation by all well-meaning Nigerians as well as prosecution with maximum punishment to serve as deterrent to others.

He said that Mmesoma’s actions were deliberately planned and executed with sinister motives.

“Her appearance at the panel set up by the Anambra State Government shows she has criminal intents. Her pretences of remorse was an afterthought and a decoy to deceive the public.

“Of course she had no choice because it was clear to her that there was no hiding place as she was overwhelmed by the evidences against her.

“Every criminal will certainly feign remorsefulness as a last resort. We intend to bring the full wrath of the law to bear on her so that other young people in the country would know that there are consequences for crime.

“Therefore, apart from the three-year ban from our exams, we intend to arrest and prosecute her.

“What she did was a deliberate plan to pull down JAMB and damage its integrity that has been established through the best quality service epitomised by the Registrar and management.

“Secondly, her action was capable of causing sectional crisis with unguarded utterances of some people who took the line of ethnic and religious sentiments on the matter,” Fabian said and called out specifically, the former Education Minister.

“The reactions of many otherwise respectable people on the matter were quite unbelievable as they were capable of igniting sectional tension.

“For example, Oby Ezekwesili was a disappointment here. As a former Education Minister, one expected her to know more about issues like examinations. For a former education Minister to doubt JAMB’s position as well as called for forensic investigation, in spite of our public presentations, was quite unexpected of someone of her public standing. Was she saying that as an examination regulatory body JAMB has no powers to carry out investigations and impose sanctions? How can a former Education Minister doubt the credibility of the Board’s verdict in a matter like that? It was a disappointment she opted to play to the gallery,” he stated.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Turaki-led PDP wins as Court of Appeal affirms Wole Oluyede as duly nominated candidate for Ekiti

Published

on

Please Kindly Share This Story

Dr. Wole Oluyede has been affirmed as the duly nominated candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, for the Ekiti State governorship election.

The Court of Appeal, Akure Division, made the affirmation in a landmark judgment, thereby giving validity of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) primary election for the same.

In a unanimous decision, the three-man appellate panel led by Hon. Justice Peter Chudi Obiorah, alongside Hon. Justice Jane Esienanwan Inyang and Hon. Justice Peter O. Affen, set aside the earlier judgment of the Federal High Court, Ado-Ekiti.

The justices held that the primary election conducted by the Kabiru Tanimu Turaki-led National Working Committee (NWC) was valid, transparent, and complied with the party’s constitution and the Electoral Act.

On the 13th of January, 2026, the Federal High Court, Ado-Ekiti nullified the Ekiti State Governorship primary election conducted on the 8th and 9th November, 2025.

Dissatisfied with the judgment, the Party appealed to the Court of Appeal and today, the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and set aside the judgment of the Federal High Court..

The Court further held that the primary election was duly conducted.

This judgment effectively puts to rest the leadership and candidacy disputes that have shadowed the party’s preparations for the 2026 Ekiti State Governorship Election. By upholding the Turaki-led process, the Court has provided the necessary legal finality to ensure the PDP enters the general election as a unified front.

Continue Reading

News

India slaps Nigeria, rejects Tinubu’s ambassador-designate

Published

on

Please Kindly Share This Story

India and some other countries have reportedly  declined to accept some of President Bola Tinubu’s recently posted ambassadors-designate due to diplomatic policies that discourage receiving envoys from administrations with less than two years remaining in office.

According to reports in the media, India, where career diplomat Ambassador Muhammad Dahiru has been designated to serve, maintains a standing policy against accepting ambassadors from governments with tenures of less than two years remaining.

India is exercising its discretionary powers to turn down the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ request to accept Dahiru’s posting.

According to sources quoted by the report, the Federal Government was already receiving signals from New Delhi and possibly other capitals about their reluctance to grant agrément.

Agrément is the formal approval given by a receiving country to accept a diplomat designated by the sending country, and it is a prerequisite before an ambassador can assume duty.

“They don’t accept an ambassador from an administration that has less than two years in office. So they are giving us that body language already,” a Presidency official was quoted to have said

The source continued, “Some countries are reluctant to accept some people, not because of the individuals but because of time. They are already seeing the Tinubu government as an outgoing government.

“So their concern is that he has just one year left, so what if he doesn’t win the election? Another government may come and remove them. We also understand that some countries have this policy. Any ambassador from an administration that has less than a year or two in office will not get accepted. And one of such countries is India.”

 

Continue Reading

News

Belonging to two political parties to attract imprisonment

Published

on

Please Kindly Share This Story

The House of Representatives on Wednesday amended Section 77 of the recently assented Electoral Act 2026 to prescribe two-year jail term or N10 million fines or both, for anyone who knowingly maintains membership of two political parties at the same time.

Lawmakers during the committee of the whole presided by Deputy Speaker Benjamin Okezie Kalu, made amendment to section 77 of the 2026 Act by inserting three new clauses 8, 9 and 10 which were considered and approved by lawmakers after a heated session of back and forth debates.

According to the new clauses approved by lawmakers, any party member found to be registered as member of more than one political party at the same time will have his or membership of the said parties voided.

Clause (8) of the approved amendment stipulates that “A person shall not be registered as a member of more than one political party at the same time.”

Clause (9) stipulates that “Where it is established that a person is registered as a member of more than one political at the same time, such dual membership shall be void, and the person shall cease to be recognised as a valid member of any political party pending regularisation in accordance with the provisions of this Act and the constitution of the political party concerned.

Clause (10) stipulates that “A person who knowingly registers or maintains membership in more than one political party at the same time commits an offence is liable on conviction to a fine of N10,000,000 or to imprisonment for a term of two years, or both.”

 

 

 

Continue Reading

Trending