Connect with us

News

Dismiss application for live broadcast of proceedings, Tinubu, Shettima tell court

Published

on

Please Kindly Share This Story

The Presidential Election Petition Court has been urged to dismiss the application by Atiku Abubakar and the Peoples Democratic Party for a live broadcast of proceedings.

President-elect, Bola Tinubu and his vice, Kashim Shettima told the court that the relief sought by the applicants are not such that the court could grant it.

“With much respect to the petitioners, the motion is an abuse of the processes of this honourable court,” the respondents stated.

Besides describing the application as frivolous, they said the court is not a soapbox, stadium or theatre where the public should be entertained.

They made the submission through their team of lawyers, led by Chief Wole Olanipekun and wondered why a petitioner would file an application to distract the court and waste its precious time.

They stated, in the counter affidavit, that the application relates to policy formulation of the court, which is outside the PEPC’s jurisdiction as constituted.

“The application also touches on the powers and jurisdiction invested in the President of the Court of Appeal by the Constitution, over which this honourable court as presently constituted cannot entertain.

“The application touches on the administrative functions, which are exclusively reserved for the President of the Court of Appeal.

“The application is aimed at dissipating the precious judicial time of this honourable court.

“The said application does not have any bearing with the petition filed by the petitioners before this honourable court.

“It is in the interest of justice for this honourable court to dismiss the said application filed by the petitioners,” they said.

In an attached written address, the respondents faulted the applicants’ reference to the fact that virtual proceedings were allowed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

They argued that Atiku and his party failed to draw the court’s attention to the fact that practice directions were made by the respective courts for the exercise.

“Another angle to this very curious application is the invitation it extends to the court to make an order that it cannot supervise.

“The position of the law remains, and we do submit that the court, like nature, does not make an order in vain, or an order which is incapable of enforcement,” the respondents stated.

More so, they stated that “At the very best, this application is academic, very otiose, very unnecessary, very time-wasting, most unusual and most unexpected, particularly, from a set of petitioners, who should be praying for the expeditious trial of their petition.

“Petitioners have brought their application under Section 36(3) of the Constitution which provides that the proceedings of a court/tribunal shall be held in public.

“The word ‘public’ as applied under Section 36(3) of the Constitution has been defined in a plethora of judicial authorities to mean a place where members of the public have unhindered access, and the court itself, sitting behind open doors, not in the camera.

“Even in situations where a class action is presented, the particular people constituting the class being represented by the plaintiffs or petitioners are always defined in the originating process.

“Here, in this application, the public at whose behest this application has been presented is not defined, not known, not discernable.

“Beyond all these, it is our submission that the court of law must and should always remain what it is, what it should be and what it is expected to be: a serene, disciplined, hallowed, tranquil, honourable and decorous institution and place.

“It is not a rostrum or a soapbox. It is not also a stadium or theatre. It is not an arena for ‘public’ entertainment.

“With much respect to the petitioners, the motion is an abuse of the processes of this honourable court.”

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Fubara to commission 10 completed projects

Published

on

Please Kindly Share This Story

Rivers State Government will from Monday, August 17, begin the commissioning of 10 major people-oriented projects across the state as part of efforts by Governor Siminalayi Fubara’s administration to deepen development at the grassroots.

The commissioning programme, which will run through August 31, will cover projects across several local government areas, include roads, bridges, healthcare facilities, educational infrastructure and other public facilities.

The Secretary to the Rivers State Government, Dr Dagogo Wokoma, disclosed this on Friday during a media briefing in Port Harcourt.

According to Dr Wokoma, the projects are tangible evidence of the Governor’s commitment to transforming communities and addressing the developmental needs of residents across the state.

A statement by Juliana Masi, Head, Information and Public Relations Unit, office of the Secretary to the State Government, said that Dr. Wokoma disclosed that the commissioning will commence on August 17 with the Buguma-Degema-Abonnema Road, which links communities in Asari-Toru, Degema and Akuku-Toru Local Government Areas.

The Egwi-Afara-Mba Road in Etche Local Government Area will be commissioned on August 18, followed by the Capt. Elechi Amadi Polytechnic’s Entrepreneurship Centre/Engineering Faculty Building on August 19.

The statement which was shared by  Onwuka Nzechi, Chief Press Secretary to the River State Governor also stated that on August 20, the Governor will commission the Elele-Egbeda-Omoku Dual Carriage Way in Ikwerre/Emohua/Onelga Local Government Areas, while the Omoku Zonal Hospital, Omoku in ONELGA, will be commissioned on August 21st.

The commissioning programme will resume on August 24 with the Omademe Internal Roads in Ikwerre LGA and attention will shift to Port Harcourt LGA on August 25 for the Commissioning of the New Runway at the Air Force Base, Rumuola.

On August 26, attention will shift to Emuoha LGA for the commissing of the Agba Ndele Road and Bridge while two major health facilities — the Neuro Psychiatric Hospital and New General Hospital, Rumuigbo, both in Obio/Akpor — are scheduled for commissioning on August 27.

The 10-day programme will end on August 28 with the commissioning of the Bonny National Grammar School in Bonny Local Government Area.

Dr. Wokoma said the projects reflected the administration’s determination to ensure that government policies and programmes affect citizens positively.

“These projects scheduled for commissioning are tangible evidence of His Excellency’s unwavering dedication to transform our communities and address the developmental needs of our people,” he said.

He added that the projects underscored the administration’s commitment to ensuring that governance produced “meaningful and measurable benefits for every citizen across the 23 Local Government Areas of the State.”

The SSG also acknowledged the contributions of government officials, contractors, host communities and other stakeholders to the completion of the projects as he urged Rivers people to participate in the commissioning activities and continue to support the administration in its pursuit of peace and development.

“We invite all Rivers people to join in celebrating these milestones and to continue supporting the administration of Governor Siminalayi Fubara as it advances peace, development, progress, and prosperity,” Dr Wokoma said.

Continue Reading

News

2027: Full text of what NHRC boss Tony Ojukwu said concerning rising incidences of hate speech, intimidation and threat to life

Published

on

Please Kindly Share This Story

I welcome you to this press conference convened by the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) at a critical moment in our national life.

As Nigeria prepares for the 2027 General Elections, the Commission considers it necessary to draw public attention to the growing use of hateful, intimidating, intolerant, denigrating, violence, inflammatory and divisive rhetoric and its potential consequences for human rights, peaceful coexistence and democratic participation.
The NHRC, as Nigeria’s independent National Human Rights Institution with a mandate to promote, protect and monitor human rights, has a responsibility to speak whenever public discourse threatens peaceful coexistence, human dignity, equality, peace and the enjoyment of fundamental rights and freedoms.

1. WHY WE ARE HERE
In recent weeks, the Commission has had cause to express concern over statements attributed to certain public figures, including Sheikh Sani Yahaya Jingir and Senator Francis Fadahunsi, which, in the assessment of the Commission, have crossed the red line for decency, have the potential to denigrate individuals or groups, deepen social divisions and heighten tensions and instigate violence.
The Commission reiterates that freedom of expression is a fundamental human right. However, freedom of expression carries responsibilities. It does not provide a licence to incite violence, promote hatred, dehumanise others or deliberately provoke hostility against persons or communities.
Our intervention today is therefore not directed at any political party, religious group, ethnic community or individual. It is a human rights intervention aimed at protecting the dignity and equal worth of every person and preserving the conditions necessary for peaceful, credible and inclusive elections.

 

2. HATE SPEECH AND DIVISIVE RHETORIC: A HUMAN RIGHTS CONCERN
Hate speech should not be dismissed as mere political rhetoric or provocative language.
When public discourse portrays individuals or communities as enemies, inferior, dangerous or undeserving of rights and protection, it can contribute to discrimination, exclusion, intimidation and violence.
The consequences may include:
• Erosion of human dignity and equality;
• Incitement and escalation of violence;
• Discrimination against individuals and communities;
• Restrictions on meaningful political participation;
• Intimidation of voters and political opponents;
• Deepening of ethnic, religious and regional divisions; and
• Undermining of public confidence in democratic institutions.
These concerns are firmly rooted in Nigeria’s constitutional and international human rights obligations, including the protection of human dignity, equality, freedom of expression and peaceful participation in public affairs.
The appropriate response, however, must always be grounded in law, due process and respect for fundamental rights.
3. LESSONS FROM HISTORY
History has demonstrated that sustained denigrating, dehumanising and inflammatory rhetoric can create an environment in which discrimination and violence become increasingly acceptable.
The experience of the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda remains one of the world’s most painful reminders of the destructive power of propaganda, denigration, dehumanisation and incitement.
Nigeria is not Rwanda, but the Commission suggests that the situation if unchecked could escalate circumstances into uncontrolled violence and chaos. God forbid. Nevertheless, the lesson is universal: societies must not wait until inflammatory rhetoric translates into violence before taking preventive action.
Prevention is a fundamental human rights obligation and the government has the primary responsibility under both national and international law to prevent violence and protect the people.
We must therefore identify and address dangerous narratives early, strengthen responsible public communication and ensure that those who cross the boundaries established by law are held accountable through lawful processes.

4. THE STAKES FOR THE 2027 GENERAL ELECTIONS
Elections should provide citizens with an opportunity to freely determine their political future.
The 2027 General Elections must therefore be contests of ideas, policies, programmes, competence and service—not contests defined by hatred, ethnic hostility or religious antagonism.
Unchecked divisive rhetoric can contribute to:
1. Political violence through attacks, intimidation and threats against opponents and voters;
2. Communal tensions by exploiting ethnic, religious and regional identities;
3. Displacement and insecurity where communities feel threatened or targeted;
4. Suppression of civic participation where citizens become afraid to speak, assemble or come out to vote freely;
5. Erosion of democratic institutions and public trust; and
6. Long-term social fragmentation that may persist long after an election has ended.
The protection of human rights and the prevention of election-related violence must therefore be regarded as complementary objectives.
5. THE POSITION OF THE NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
The NHRC unequivocally condemns hate speech, incitement to violence, intimidation, or dehumanising rhetoric and all forms of communication that threaten the dignity, security and rights of individuals or communities.
Accordingly, the Commission:
First, calls on all public officials, political actors, candidates and aspirants to exercise the highest level of responsibility in their public statements and political communication.
Second, urges political parties to call their party faithfuls to order and strengthen internal mechanisms for preventing and sanctioning intimidating and inflammatory rhetoric and to promote issue-based campaigns that respect rights.
Third, calls on religious, traditional and community leaders to use their considerable influence to promote peace, tolerance, mutual respect and peaceful coexistence rather to promote hate and violence and disunity.
Fourth, urges law enforcement and other relevant institutions to respond appropriately to credible cases of incitement, intimidation, threats and unlawful conduct, in accordance with the Constitution and applicable laws, while respecting due process and fundamental rights.
Fifth, calls on the media to uphold professional and ethical standards in reporting intimidating and inflammatory statements. Responsible journalism requires that potentially harmful content is not amplified without context, verification and appropriate public-interest considerations.
Sixth, calls on social media users and digital platforms to exercise responsibility in the creation and dissemination of content. Nigerians should verify information before sharing content capable of provoking hatred, hostility or violence.
Seventh, encourages citizens who experience or witness human rights violations to report them through appropriate lawful channels, including the National Human Rights Commission.
6. A CALL FOR RESPONSIBLE LEADERSHIP
The responsibility for preventing election-related violence does not rest with government or security institutions alone. Every Nigerian has a role to play.
To our political leaders, we say: compete on ideas, programmes, competence and your record of service—not on hatred or division.
To our religious and traditional leaders, we say: use your platforms to build bridges, promote tolerance and protect the dignity of every Nigerian.
To the media, we say: inform the public without becoming an amplifier of hatred or incitement.
To young Nigerians, particularly those who constitute a significant part of our online population, we say: do not allow yourselves to be used as instruments for spreading inflammatory content or misinformation.
And to all Nigerians, we say: our ethnic, religious and cultural diversity is not a weakness. It is part of the richness of our national identity.
7. THE WAY FORWARD
The NHRC will continue to monitor developments, document human rights concerns, engage relevant stakeholders and use its statutory powers to promote and protect human rights throughout the electoral cycle.
The Commission will also continue to advocate for a human rights-based approach to elections—one that places the dignity, safety, equality and participation of every Nigerian at the centre of the democratic process.
We must act before rhetoric becomes violence.
We must promote dialogue before division becomes conflict.
And we must protect human dignity before violations become irreversible.
8. CONCLUSION
Distinguished Ladies and Gentlemen,
The forth coming elections should be an opportunity to strengthen our democracy, not a trigger for division.
Nigeria has faced difficult moments before, and we have repeatedly demonstrated the capacity to overcome our differences. What we need now is responsible leadership, responsible communication and a renewed commitment to the fundamental principle that every Nigerian is entitled to dignity, equality and protection under the law.
The National Human Rights Commission will not remain silent when human dignity and fundamental rights are threatened.
We call on all stakeholders to join us in building an electoral environment in which disagreement does not become hatred, political competition does not become violence, and diversity does not become a justification for discrimination.
Let us disagree without dehumanising one another.
Let us compete without destroying one another.
Let us campaign without inciting one another.
And let us protect the Nigeria we all share.
I thank you for your attention.
I am now ready to take your questions.

*Chief Tony Ojukwu, OFR, SAN*
*Executive Secretary/CEO*
*National Human Rights Commission*
*President Network of National Human Rights Institutions*
*in West Africa*

Continue Reading

News

Breaking: Court of Appeal rules in favour of Turaki -led PDP candidate for Osun governorship election

Published

on

Please Kindly Share This Story

The Court of Appeal, Abuja Division, on Thursday, ruled that the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP Gubernatorial Candidate in Osun State was validly nominated by the Tanimu Turaki-led National Working Committee.

The court also ordered INEC to list the PDP logo on the ballot ahead of Saturday’s gubernatorial election.

The Court held that access code is neither a creation of the Constitution nor the Electoral Act; rather, a creation of INEC’s guidelines and cannot, in any way, override the provisions of the Constitution.

Section 288 of the Constitution does not specify the method for nominating candidates; it only states that the names of candidates should be forwarded to the Commission.

The court further held that the defendant (INEC) should take steps to include the name of the appellant on the ballot paper.

Additionally, the court ruled that the primary election conducted by the Tanimu Turaki-led National Working Committee (NWC) of the PDP was a valid primary election in law.

The three-man panel of justices—Justice Mahmud, Justice Jaro, and Justice Ankawere, was unanimous in its judgment.

Continue Reading

Trending