News
Centre says JAMB’s ban on Mmesoma violates her Rights as a child
Our attention has been drawn to the recent case of Miss Ejikeme Joy Mmesoma’s alleged fake JAMB score which is trending in the national dailies and many social media platforms. It is reported that the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) accused Miss Ejikeme of manipulating her UTME result to fraudulently attract scholarship and recognition. This careless, apparently official statement, has sparked viscous and unrelenting condemnation of the girl whose only offense is that she made the highest score in JAMB. The examination body went to town with news of her ‘manually’ manipulating her own results before launching a discreet investigation into how and why a young, innocent girl of her class could go into such high-tech gymnastics. According to JAMB, ‘Ejikeme Joy Mmesoma manually inflated her UTME result from 249 to 362, using the inflated score to secure a N3 million scholarship from Innoson Motors.’ It should be noted that the Anambra State Government was also set to award her another scholarship before the forgery allegations broke out.
JAMB stopped short of telling the world how she inflated her score, when she did it, whether or not she did it alone or in consortium with some high-tech wizards, or the app or software used to hack JAMB’s data base or server. Someone who uses an app or a computer application to inflate a JAMB score cannot be said to have ‘manually’ inflated her UTME result.’ There is a clear difference between manual and electronic applications or manipulation.
While the public uproar and angst against the innocent girl raged, JAMB has since gone into the dark recesses of its infamy, refusing to give further details or substantiate it’s premature and blatant allegations. It appears JAMB’s grouse is that INNOSON has awarded the young girl N3m scholarship, and Anambra State Government is also getting set to award more scholarship. This, to the handlers of JAMB is too much for a young girl from Anambra State! Maybe if Mmesoma were from North East or North West of the country, JAMB may not have seen anything wrong with her score. But coming from Anambra State, South East Nigeria, she must be pulled down by all means!
We dare say that by this singular act of indiscretion, JAMB, like INEC, has destroyed public confidence in it’s handling of matriculation examinations in Nigeria and the process through which candidates’ scores are aggregated. Like INEC, JAMB has demonstrated untold incompetence in its ability to maintain the credibility and standard of its exams. There is public speculation that JAMB tampered with Mmesoma’s result, possibly out of jealousy over the scholarship awarded to her by INNOSON. Social media users have also taken swipes on JAMB over it’s procedural lapses and organisational ineptitude.
By coming public with such grave allegations against Mmesoma, without regard to her status as a child under the Child Rights Act of 2003, the managers and officials of JAMB have demonstrated crass ignorance of, or contempt for Nigerian laws, especially as it relates to the rights of a child. Section 11(c) of the Child Rights Act provides that ‘Every child is entitled to respect for the dignity of his (or her) person, and accordingly no child shall be subjected to attacks upon his (or her) honour or reputation.’
This Act is an adaptation of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UN General Assembly Document A/RES/44/25) adopted on 12 December 1989. Nigeria is a signatory to this Convention which sets out the fundamental rights of children and establishes the obligations of State Parties to ensure that they take all administrative and legislative measures to ensure their protection and well-being of children in their respective States. The Child Rights Act of 2003 (an Act of the National Assembly) is Nigeria’s own legislative measure to ensure the protection of children in Nigeria. As an administrative measure to ensure the rights and well-being of Nigerian children, Nigeria has also established the National Child Rights Implementation Committee to enforce the Child Rights Act. As at 2016 (the current figure is yet to be ascertained) the Child Rights Act has been codified into law by 24 out of 36 states in Nigeria, with Enugu as the latest State to enact the Child Rights Law in December 2016.
Mmesoma has been honoured as the highest scorer in 2023 Joint Admission and Matriculation examinations. This is a reputation she has acquired by mere dint of hard labour. This reputation is not unusual as those who knew her, even her teachers, testify to her brilliance and excellent academic performance. So, what exactly is the motive of JAMB in its latest acerbic vitriol against Mmesoma, especially its repeated mention of Anambra State and INNOSON in its ill-advised public statement?
We challenge and condemn whatever motive behind the latest senseless attack against a Nigerian child by JAMB, a federal government agency. JAMB has shown impunity and grave disrespect to Mmesoma’s right to dignity, and has unfortunately and unjustifiably launched the most viscous attack on her honour and her reputation, against the spirit and letters of the Child Rights Act of 2003.
We therefore call on the Federal Government, the National Child Rights Implementation Committee, and the Anambra State Government to launch a discreet investigation into the activities of JAMB, especially it’s data base to determine whether any manipulation has occurred; either by Mmesoma, as alleged, or by perverse JAMB officials against the innocent girl, to bring her and Anambra State to public odium and contempt.
The last administration of President Mohammadu Buhari did untold damage to State institutions by railroading all manner of inexperienced and incompetent people to head sensitive positions of authority. The time has therefore come, and it is now, when the present Federal Government must elevate merit above mediocrity by weeding out all incompetent and inexperienced people from high public offices.
The importance of supporting children with outstanding academic performances cannot be overemphasised, and we urge Nigerians to be circumspect in swallowing the bait and infamy of JAMB until the outcome of a discreet investigation by an independent body is made public.
We agree with critics that JAMB’s press release repeatedly mentioning Anambra State instead of addressing the credibility of their own exam raises suspicion. And that, even if the allegations were true, which is denied at this point, JAMB and the media should have shown some restraint in the matter to protect a young girl from unfair public opprobrium that may last a life time. We also find merit in the opinion that JAMB may have tampered with the result of this young girl, by reducing her scores from their database out of envy over the 3 million naira scholarship from INNOSON.
Be that as it may, we dare say that even where a crime has been committed, the Child’s Right Act prohibits the publication of such information or identifying a child linked to such criminal allegations. This applies even during judicial proceedings. Miss Mmesoma is an underaged girl, a minor, who has the right to protection from cyber bullying and media trial orchestrated by an incompetent institution like JAMB. Nigerians also deserve apology from JAMB for its failure in properly utilising humongous public funds at it’s disposal to evolve an effective and seamless process in matriculation examinations.
We therefore call on Anambra State Government, women advocacy groups, and all relevant authorities, to protect Mmesoma’s image and take necessary actions against JAMB for its alleged misconduct. Mmesoma is a minor and cannot speak for herself and does not have the mental energy to defend herself in the cyber space. We therefore call on all women groups and the civil society to stand up to, not only defend Mmesoma, but to defend the Child Rights Act, and to defend the Nigerian child! JAMB must be made to pay reparations to Mmesoma for this unwarranted assault on her dignity, her honour, and her reputation.
© Chef Amos Ogbonnaya
Executive Director
Centre for Nonviolence and Social Justice ✍️
News
Northern Group shoves Atiku over attack on Goodluck Jonathan
By Bonaventure Phillips Melah
Arewa Mandate for Unity and National Rebirth (AMUNR), has criticized former vice president, Atiku Abubakar for his recent attack on former President Goodluck Jonathan.
Atiku, the presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the 2023 general election, had on Wednesday described Jonathan’s presidency as a ‘product of inexperience, among other unsavoury remarks.
But reacting to the development on Thursday, AMUNR, through a statement signed by Danladi Luka Ishiaku and Basiru Usman Wakili, National Coordinator and National Secretary respectively, urged Atiku to pursue his presidential ambition without looking for who to blame for his years of political misfortune.
AMUNR said contrary to Atiku’s wrong narrative, Dr. Goodluck Jonathan served Nigeria for 16 uninterrupted years from deputy governor to governor, vice president to acting president and president of the country for five years, adding that he was much more prepared to serve Nigeria at the highest level, with achievements that are yet to be equalled by any Nigerian leader in history.
The group said Atiku has failed to achieve his presidential ambition, partly due to what it described as desperation and impatience which it said was responsible for his movement from PDP to three different parties and back to PDP and now to ADC, saying Atiku would have served as president under the PDP of he had allowed Jonathan to complete his terms without disrupting the system.
It therefore advised the former vice president to blame himself and not Jonathan for his political woes.
AMUNR said- “Our attention has been drawn to the now familiar comments by former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar, who has chosen to substitute revisionism for reality by branding Dr. Goodluck Jonathan’s presidency as a product of “inexperience.” This claim is not just wrong; it is mischievous.
“Dr. Jonathan rose through every constitutional rung of leadership—Deputy Governor, Governor, Vice-President, and Acting President during the national uncertainty that followed the illness of Umaru Musa Yar’Adua. To dismiss that trajectory as “inexperience” is either a willful distortion of facts or a troubling misunderstanding of governance itself.
“But perhaps the more pressing question is this: from what vantage point is this judgment being made?
“Here is a man who has spent decades in perpetual pursuit of the presidency contesting, recalibrating, and returning, yet has never once borne the full weight of that office. It is, therefore, remarkable that someone whose “experience” is defined largely by ambition now seeks to diminish the record of someone whose experience was tested in office, under pressure, and in history’s full glare.
“Under Dr. Jonathan, Nigeria did not drift, it advanced. The economy was rebased, emerging as Africa’s largest. The power sector was unbundled after years of entrenched dysfunction. Agricultural corruption networks were dismantled. Rail and road infrastructure, long abandoned, were revived. These are not opinions; they are verifiable milestones.
“And then came the defining moment: when faced with the choice between personal power and national peace, Dr. Jonathan chose Nigeria. His peaceful concession in 2015 remains one of the most consequential acts of democratic leadership on the continent, an act that secured stability and earned global respect.
“That is what real leadership looks like.
“To now hear that legacy casually reduced to “inexperience” is not merely ironic, it is an attempt to gaslight a nation that lived through, and benefited from, those years.
“Nigerians remember. They remember results. They remember restraint. And they certainly remember who governed, and who merely aspired to.
“If experience is the argument, then the distinction is clear: one man has a record that can be scrutinized; the other has a résumé of repeated attempts.
“Dr. Jonathan’s legacy is not up for casual dismissal. It is written in policy, in progress, and in the democratic stability Nigeria still enjoys today.
“No amount of political revisionism can undo that record,” AMUNR concluded.
News
FG re-arrests Malami, son on arms possession, drops terrorism charge
The Federal Government, on Wednesday, withdrew the terrorism financing charge it filed against the immediate past Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mr. Abubakar Malami, SAN, and his son, Abdulaziz.
The FG, through its team of lawyers led by Mr. Akinlolu Kehinde, SAN, applied to substitute the charge with an amended one concerning the defendants’ alleged illegal possession of arms and ammunition.
It told the court that the arms and live cartridges were found in Malami’s residence in Birnin Kebbi.
Following the development, Malami — who served as Justice Minister from November 11, 2015, to May 29, 2023, under former President Muhammadu Buhari’s administration — and his son took fresh pleas of not guilty to the five-count amended charge.
The defence lawyer, Mr. Shuaibu Arua, SAN, who did not oppose the withdrawal and substitution of the initial charge, persuaded the court, however, to allow the defendants to retain the bail that was initially granted to them.
The application for the defendant’s bail was not challenged by prosecution counsel.
Consequently, trial Justice Joyce Abdulmalik held that the bail the court granted the defendants on February 27, as well as all the conditions already fulfilled, would subsist.
The court subsequently fixed May 26 and June 15 for trial.
News
Don’t work with terrorists, Zulum warns Borno residents
Borno State Governor, Professor Babagana Umara Zulum, has warned residents against aiding, harbouring, or providing logistical support to Boko Haram insurgents.
The warning follows recent operations conducted by the Air Component of Operation Hadin Kai in the Jilli general area of Gubio Local Government Area on April 11, 2026.
Jilli, a border community between Gubio Local Government Area of Borno State and Geidam Local Government Area of Yobe State, was reportedly affected during the operation.
In a statement by the Governor’s Special Adviser on Media, Dauda Iliya, Governor Zulum described Jilli market as a notorious hub allegedly used by insurgents and their logistics suppliers.
“I have been properly briefed on the airstrike carried out by the Air Component of Operation Hadin Kai on Jilli market, a border town between Borno and Yobe states. Let me state categorically that the Borno State Government closed Jilli and Gazabure markets five years ago,” the Governor stated.
He added that he is in close consultation with the Yobe State Government and the military hierarchy on the matter.
Governor Zulum explained that the state government maintains close coordination with the military and other security agencies before resettling any community or reopening markets, particularly in areas affected by insurgency.
He reiterated his administration’s commitment to protecting law-abiding citizens and sustaining collaboration with security agencies to restore lasting peace and stability.
The Governor also urged residents to remain vigilant and support security agencies with credible information to aid ongoing military operations.
-
News1 year agoSenate to speed up conclusion of Nigeria Forest Security Service Bill
-
News3 years agoBreaking: Tinubu’s authentic ministerial nominees
-
News8 months agoThe Many Lies Against Bashir Haske
-
News3 years ago“Anytime we want to kill terrorists, President would ask us to take permission from France but they were killing our soldiers-” Niger Republic coup leader
-
News3 years ago“I’m leaving the Catholic church because Bishop Onah is oppressing me,” says Okunerere
-
News3 years agoRadio Nigeria’s veteran broadcaster Kelvin Ugwu dies three months after retirement from service
-
News3 years agoDokpesi and the Gazebo Mystique
-
News3 years agoTsunami: Tinubu orders dissolution of managements, boards of MDAs, to sack all Buhari’s political appointees
